It means exactly what it says. If you can't figure it out, there's really no point in explaining it to you. Actually here goes, It means I figured you guys were smart enough to pick up on the ironic sarcasim I was putting down but you guys are not. I only thought that cause usually you guys can tell if someone is being sarcastic without them telling you but I gave you more benifit than you deserve or thought you were capable of. My bad, I will lable my sarcasim for anyone who needs help understanding. My point still stands. We were not there so we can't pass judgment. Feel bad for whoever want too. I love America but we are some pretty insecure people who think we need materials posessions to be secure. That's why it's sounds contradictory, cause you people don't get it or me for that matter. Im done with this thread. These people died years ago anyway what's done is done & it can't be changed with an old ass Internet video that was biased from the begining of the report.
This is a matter of debate. While I respect your opinion, I completely disagree. However, it doesn't matter. Once you're in a war, you must fight to win. If we used these standards in WW2, WW1, or any other, all armies could be labeled war criminals. Pointless.
"Fighting to win" doesn't involve shooting civilians. This war is also virtually unwinable. There will always be people who hate and want to hurt the united states, so the best way to "win" would be to respect their cultures, values, and choice of government and then to back off of them. Then they won't have reason to attack us.
It really is that simple. They hate us. So instead of attacking them (even though we attacked the wrong people) we need to work with them, and get the hell out of their country for the sake of peace. "Have you ever read about the reasons they attacked us? They attack us because we've been over there. We've been bombing Iraq for 10 years." - Ron Paul said this at a 2008 republican presidential debate and was of course greeted with anger and hostility by people who didn't want to take responsibility for the repercussions of their actions.
I'm not going to argue with you. You and I subscribe to completely different philosophies. This is such an old debate. You will not see my point of view and I will not see yours. I flat out disagree with you.
Why were we there for the last 10yrs. We were enforcing that f*cking no-fly zone. Why was there a need for the no-fly zone. Saddam. I knew some of the airmen in the Khobar Towers attack. The only reason we were there was for that GD no-fly zone. Those men and women are never fricken mentioned in this stupid debate.
try to work with people that hate us and want to kill us? I'm pretty sure they don't want to work with us.
That's the thing though, we're past the point of no return. What's been done is done [by both sides] Of course its all f'd up, but that's just how war is. I don't think there is any working with them anymore, we're too far gone. I mean, this may just be my view on it, but I think that if we were to move out from their country, they'd just plan an attack, I honestly do think that. Yes they attack us because we attacked them, but the way things have been going for so long, I doubt they'd let up.
this thread is pointless just like those countries. we should just nuke them all,whoever says anything about peace is a retard, there will never be peace.its not real.there never has been peace and never will be.we should open fire on everyone walking those streets, because they all hate us.
