Kgamelover and kjib can you please continue this conversation else where? I really want to read cdubby's reply.
As was intended. This however goes back to the late 1990's. The existence alone of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was treated by lenders as an implied guarantee on loans they made. This was so ingrained that wallstreet investors banked on it. Congress intended exactly this I suspect to give the CRA some meaning.
I enjoy you posts as well. The fear is that private interests can't compete with gov(taxpayer backed) and they will be driven from the market.
True. Hopefully the gov. would apply the maximum market share with themselve's as well. Although I do doubt they will since many people don't have a private insurance company provider right now. But if things are out of control, we can not vote for the representatives promoting health care price raises. I'm sure they wont do that though. Most politicians are after power and a higher standing in congress, and this would prove detrimental to their aspirations. At least that's my cynical view on politicians
If the UK is anything to go by, the government's healthcare service will be so popular that the quality of service suffers... longer waiting times, less than perfect conditions, that's not to say it's terrible... but what do you expect for free. There will still be people who demand luxury and they'll turn to the private companies.
SKIPPER!!!!! I was wondering what happened to you, good to see you back . I SUCK at Na'vi, still haven't learned anything.
I am not joking. Social groups don't do anything, and you making a how to be funny group makes me laugh. Turning the tables
