Stealthbomber and Snot Rocker - sudden debut at top 10 US games ?

Discussion in 'Public Game Developers Forum' started by MikeSz_spokko, Apr 27, 2010.

  1. Stroffolino

    Stroffolino Well-Known Member
    Patreon Silver

    Apr 28, 2009
    1,100
    8
    38
    Software Engineer
    Pennsylvania
    But you don't need 20-25k downloads simply to land in the top 100 pay apps.

    Getting into the top 100 pay apps is the hard part. Once you are in the top 100, the massive boost in visibility will propell most apps in an upwards trajectory that can sustain itself with legit downloads for quite some time, even with an average/mediocre app. Whatever these guys did to get their concentrated burst of downloads, I'm quite sure that the money they're making has more than paid for the costs.

     
  2. Sinecure Industries

    Sinecure Industries Well-Known Member


    I think if they can max out for a given hour that should propel them up quite a bit, just as a trending app. If Apple's ranking system sees a major push it's going to capitalize on that and shoot it up the ranks. Your theory makes perfect sense
     
  3. therhino

    therhino Well-Known Member

    Jan 27, 2010
    437
    0
    0
    Georgia
    Yeah I wonder how long Apple will let this run its course before they shut it down, I give those guys credit, however they hacked/abused the system it worked and they're going to make some good money off of it.
     
  4. MikeSz_spokko

    MikeSz_spokko Well-Known Member

    May 27, 2009
    594
    0
    16
    Yes, if the rankings take "hourly traffic" into consideration in any way - this would be much much easier to achieve

    However - I dont think the "self propelled" theory works too well here. Stealthbomber only got 9 reviews since it reached #1, so I dont think they made much money from this stunt. They'd need thousands of sales to cover the expense, but thousands of customers would leave a bit more reviews
     
  5. MikeSz_spokko

    MikeSz_spokko Well-Known Member

    May 27, 2009
    594
    0
    16
  6. Venan

    Venan Well-Known Member

    Jan 13, 2010
    174
    0
    0
    #27 Venan, Apr 27, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2010
    Great thread, this has been bugging the heck out of me as well.

    I think based on how quickly it appears, how quickly it has tapered off, and the number of reviews that are being left (almost none and universally poor), I can't see any possibility besides a mass purchase of their own game, and I suspect it is automated as well. The only headache would be setting up the original accounts, but then you just dump them in a database and let a program do the purchasing for you. In the great scheme of spending marketing dollars - 7k to appear in the top 10 is chump change when it's a guaranteed result.

    Looking at our own trends, the ranking algorithm changes you hour by hour, and you can bump immediately if you see a sales spike, so I don't think it would take very long to work. Other anecdotal stuff that I've heard from the freeapp<whatever> also show titles shooting from buried to top 10 in a matter of hours.

    Similarly, it wouldn't be hard to track your sales once you reach the top and slow down your purchasing to maintenance mode, basically making up the difference to keep your app up there. It also wouldn't be hard to have a program even learn these trends and taper purchasing appropriately. Actually, it kind of sounds like a fun algorithm to write.

    Hopefully Apple will detect and crack down on this. It's a bit less smarmy than the fake reviews, since they are at least spending money, but not by much.

    Edit: Also, seeing as how gifting apps doesn't affect your ranking, one could intuit that they are not in favor of people buying their ranking on the App Store.
     
  7. mean_monkey

    mean_monkey Well-Known Member

    Feb 27, 2009
    104
    2
    18
    Male
    Game Developer
    Indonesia
    #28 mean_monkey, Apr 27, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2010
    Yeah not only for their own games, this is a very good business. I can foresee lots of games soon in queue of Jirbo's service as soon as they start accepting apps.
     
  8. NJ Software

    NJ Software Member

    Sep 26, 2009
    19
    0
    0
    iPhone app developer
    It's not all too surprising that someone is able to game the system this way. I just read an article in the NY Times about how spammers are paying next to nothing to workers in foreign countries to decipher captchas (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/technology/26captcha.html). It's just a short step to translate this into an app store scheme. Now Apple needs to figure out a way to prevent this.
     
  9. EMTKiNG

    EMTKiNG Well-Known Member

    Apr 7, 2010
    1,619
    0
    0
    EMT
    Los Angeles,CA
    Jirbo FAILS just like their cookie cutter games! They can manipulate the charts all they want. People know which games belong on the top.
     
  10. Uptown Arts

    Uptown Arts Well-Known Member

    I don't have that much faith in people. I remember when some glow-stick app was placed in the #1 spot by some freak iTunes screwup, and was still top ranked days later. Even the dev was shocked.
     
  11. EssentialParadox

    EssentialParadox Well-Known Member

    Sep 21, 2009
    602
    0
    0
    UK / Toronto
    I think this is a big issue, not just of some sly people gaming the system, but the whole App store sales structure that has 90% of sales contained in the top ten charts, which only serves to encourage low pricing and schemes like this.

    I believe this is the reason Apple have hired Matt Casamassina, the editor from IGN. From his comments about the new role, it appears Apple may be leaning more toward quality 'picks' and less away from the charts, and maybe even some editorial context to organize the store. I'm excited to see what happens with it.
     
  12. Stroffolino

    Stroffolino Well-Known Member
    Patreon Silver

    Apr 28, 2009
    1,100
    8
    38
    Software Engineer
    Pennsylvania
    Is it really just 90% of sales in the top 10 charts? I'd have thought it was even more.

    iPad AppStore feels like an experiment in this direction. Apple takes a heavy hand steering device owners towards what Apple consider noteworthy, and there's no obvious way for users to even browse new releases. If an app didn't get hand picked by Apple and isn't keyword/search friendly, it's unlikely that people will stumble across it without advertising outside the AppStore. Search results are heavily biased towards more expensive apps.

    I don't know what's better selfishly, for Apple, or for customers. But I do wish Apple was more transparent about how AppStore mechanics worked, and how they'll work in the future. Flawed or not, I would put more trust in an AppStore whose rankings are based on objective criteria (i.e. download windows with public rankings) moreso than one that is tied to an editorial board.

     
  13. scotopia

    scotopia Well-Known Member

    Feb 6, 2009
    270
    0
    0
    Interesting; I hope he does make the system change for the better. At any rate, I think you guys have pretty much nailed what Jirbo is doing. Maybe we should collectively report this to Apple somehow? I know they are not that great with response, but it seems like this kind of abuse, especially if it becomes a "service" in the future, will majorly decrease the average quality of the App Store's "Top Apps"; I don't think they will like that very much. Therefore they might investigate this seriously.
     
  14. Vovin

    Vovin 👮 Spam Police 🚓

    Nov 28, 2009
    6,514
    3
    38
    Germany
    #35 Vovin, Apr 28, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2010
    Investigation? You've got my interest. :D

    I collected some facts already. If you're interested, here they are...

    First, here is a list of all apps available from Jirgo:

    http://ax.search.itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZSearch.woa/wa/search?entity=software&media=all&restrict=true&submit=seeAllLockups&term=jirbo


    Here are Jirbo's rankings from Topappcharts:

    http://www.topappcharts.com/search.php?string=Jirbo&show=search&price=any


    So, where do we start?

    Maybe at The Street:

    http://www.thestreet.com/story/10719624/massive-daily-ipad-app-downloads-for-social-gaming-company-jirbo-inc.html

    Jirbo points out to the AdColony:

    http://www.adcolony.com/

    The Register has also something to say about Jirgo:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/16/app_store_allegations/

    The article on Forbes.com involving Jirgo is quite interesting, too:

    http://www.forbes.com/2008/01/26/iphone-apple-developers-tech-wire-cx_ew_0128iphone.html

    And last but now least, even the iPhonefreakz care:

    http://iphonefreakz.com/2008/07/19/iphone-game-developer-jirbo-speaks-out/
     
  15. Stroffolino

    Stroffolino Well-Known Member
    Patreon Silver

    Apr 28, 2009
    1,100
    8
    38
    Software Engineer
    Pennsylvania
    I wouldn't sing and dance just yet. It doesn't sound like he wants to change the system, but rather to provide a filter based on his personal tastes. Great if you happen to have the same tastes as him and his team, not so much if you don't. Here's his quote:

    “In a nutshell, I will be leading the charge for games on the App Store, so whether you browse through iTunes, iPhone, iPod touch or iPad, the games content you see will be handpicked and organized by me and my team,” Mr. Casamassina said on his blog."

    Don't get me wrong, I do like the idea of better organizing AppStore content.
    The way keywords and categories are used is a bit wild west and could use some sorting out. I'd love to be able to able to browse for more eclectic things like retro arcade game ports.

     
  16. bravetarget

    bravetarget Well-Known Member

    Sep 14, 2009
    330
    0
    0
    dworld services has used this exploit before as well. simply mass buying your own apps will get you exposure and hopefully your app is appealing enough to lure real purchases.

    if apple removed refunds, this would be a great business practice... otherwise it should be banned.
     
  17. Pamx

    Pamx Well-Known Member

    Oct 9, 2009
    303
    0
    0
    UK
    No evidence has been presented to show that Jirbo have done anything wrong. I emailed them a couple of days ago & asked how they managed to achieve these download numbers. Their explanation was in-app advertising using their product, Adcolony incorporated in some of their 94 apps. I have no idea whether they were being entirely candid with me but I'm not prepared, at this stage, to make any assumptions about their integrity.
     
  18. CommanderData

    CommanderData Well-Known Member
    Patreon Indie

    Actually I think the circumstantial evidence is overwhelmingly pointing toward them manipulating their rank through mass purchase. MikeSz_spokko pointed out the interesting clue: note how FEW reviews and ratings these apps received, despite being at or nearly at the top of the app store.

    Any app or game legitimately purchased by that many people will have tons of reviews and ratings pouring in daily. This is NOT the case if you've got a mass of office workers or an automated system making purchases for you. The downloads are probably never even installed on a device, just black-holed. Note that the "rate on delete" crowd alone would account for many hundreds of ratings.

    Even more bizarre and conspiracy theorist, but potentially close to the mark- perhaps Jirbo engineered these rankings (for Stealthbomber and Snot Rocket) and are claiming the results are from Adcolony to boost *Adcolonys* popularity. Jirbo owns Adcolony, so they stand to gain plenty by convincing people that you'll see "amazing results in 24 hours or less".
     
  19. Sinecure Industries

    Sinecure Industries Well-Known Member

    I think you're exactly on the right path. The adcolony webpage has all of their apps as case studies in success. "Look at how high we can make our own apps go with our own advertising... in our own apps!"

    So people that haven't given it much thought might want to try adcolony out themselves - making them the money they put out.
     

Share This Page