Political Debate Thread

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Lounge' started by DaveMc99, Oct 15, 2009.

  1. DaveMc99

    DaveMc99 Well-Known Member

    Mar 1, 2009
    4,761
    0
    0
    Seattle, WA USA
  2. Scottlarsen

    Scottlarsen Well-Known Member

    Nov 25, 2009
    580
    0
    16
    Interesting, not that it matters. California is beyond saving at this point. We have seen this coming for decades. Perhaps we could sell it to China.:D
     
  3. spiffyone

    spiffyone Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2008
    2,562
    0
    0
    Very true. That is the primary reason such a system is in place.

    Some don't like it, especially when "their guy" loses, but the fact is that it balances out power somewhat between the states.

    The real issue, however, is gerrymandering, and how the carving up of districts to serve the interests of political parties is tantamount to gaming the system.
     
  4. spiffyone

    spiffyone Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2008
    2,562
    0
    0
    Yes, because the Democratic party isn't in the pocket of corporations either :rolleyes:

    Keep believing that there are truly significant differences between the two major parties, folks, in terms of which groups have them in their pockets, and economic and foreign policy. That lie is how the donkeys and the elephants keep their power.
     
  5. Karnith

    Karnith Well-Known Member

    Nov 26, 2009
    76
    0
    0
    You do realize that lawyers, the AARP, and celebrities have a tendency to give obscenely large campaign donations and tend to support the Democratic party in elections, right?
     
  6. Lombardo

    Lombardo Well-Known Member

    You do realize that there used to be a cap on the amount of the donation, right?
     
  7. The prez 12521

    The prez 12521 Well-Known Member

    Aug 17, 2009
    3,142
    4
    0
    School
    USA
    Youdo realize you said there usedto be a cap ergo it means nothing now, right?
     
  8. da shiz wiz 19

    da shiz wiz 19 Well-Known Member

    Sep 24, 2009
    7,318
    9
    0
    You do realize the cap was just lifted recently right?
     
  9. The prez 12521

    The prez 12521 Well-Known Member

    Aug 17, 2009
    3,142
    4
    0
    School
    USA
    Well I know that now :p
     
  10. Scottlarsen

    Scottlarsen Well-Known Member

    Nov 25, 2009
    580
    0
    16
    I would call it a level playing field. Let the best ideas win. Then for once we all could win.
     
  11. Lombardo

    Lombardo Well-Known Member

    How is it at all fair that a single group can pretty much elect their candidate of choice?
     
  12. Scottlarsen

    Scottlarsen Well-Known Member

    Nov 25, 2009
    580
    0
    16
    #292 Scottlarsen, Feb 5, 2010
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2010
    To what group are you referring? The public sector unions? They already do it. Perhaps you mean the trial (litigation) lawyers. Wait, they already do that too.
     
  13. Lombardo

    Lombardo Well-Known Member

    I'm talking about big business being able to spend millions on a candidate. This is giving companies the ability to make candidates make laws that suit their needs. "Our company will give you x amount of millions if you promise to make it legal for us to dump our waste in the rivers when you get elected."
     
  14. Scottlarsen

    Scottlarsen Well-Known Member

    Nov 25, 2009
    580
    0
    16
    Then I stand by my initial statement. Sounds like a level playing field. Where you see evil corperations dumping waste in rivers, I can easily imagine an army of Jimmy Hoffa types strong arming people to get their way. California anybody.
     
  15. LBG

    LBG SeƱor Member

    Apr 19, 2009
    7,471
    1
    0
    nada ilegal
    31.560499, -111.904128
    Speed cameras.
    They need to be destoyed.
    Speed doesn't kill, dangerous driving does.

    I'm still lmao about those MPs who have been charged over expenses (UK news). I hope they go to prison, that'd just make my day :D
     
  16. Yagami_Light

    Yagami_Light Well-Known Member

    Feb 20, 2009
    302
    1
    18
    Obama breaking promise about the Armenian Genecide

    Throughout his campaign, President Obama assured Armenian Americans that he would recognize the genocide that the Turkish committed in Armenia.

    Now, as a bill is about to go to the House of Representatives, Obama has gone back on his word, stating that he does not support the bill. He claims that passage of the bill would hurt relations between the U.S. and Turkey as well as between Turkey and Armenia.

    What do you guys think about this?
     
  17. The prez 12521

    The prez 12521 Well-Known Member

    Aug 17, 2009
    3,142
    4
    0
    School
    USA
    i think Obama=politician=political pulrgy.
     
  18. da shiz wiz 19

    da shiz wiz 19 Well-Known Member

    Sep 24, 2009
    7,318
    9
    0
    Every politician=douchebag

    Everyone=Needs to stop listening to SNL/celebrities/people and read something unbiased so I don't get pissed off at the ignorance.
     
  19. Kamazar

    Kamazar Well-Known Member

    Dec 13, 2008
    6,509
    18
    0
    On the Armenian genocide: We can barely support ourselves and the racial discord that still surges from time to time. Along with this, an economy in the tank, and a president that sadly doesn't have at least the gift of gab, we don't have the time nor resources to intervene in a genocide. Pretty stupid promise, IMO. Probably made it to get some people off his back.
     
  20. The prez 12521

    The prez 12521 Well-Known Member

    Aug 17, 2009
    3,142
    4
    0
    School
    USA
    well...not all politicians...or like middle school politicians right :D ahah

    and well, thats where people will get info...why watch the news when Seth meyers makes the news hilirious?
     

Share This Page