Amazing since worthwhile apps such as Zen Bound and Sway took forever to approve, and we're still waiting for LightRider.
What's with that rating? At this point, we may as well go back to PG, PG-13, and R because those weren't enforceable either.
It's already 0.99 and will stay that way forever no matter how many updates we do! This app is for the faithful and supporting fans (of beautiful women)!
This will be my last post in this thread. I'm a huge fan of women in general, in all shapes and sizes to be honest. But I'm definitely not a faithful supporter of garbage apps. I like my app store, I like my games, but I HATE rip-off schemes. Try something original...you know, like programing a game that takes some thought as opposed to making money off pictures you yourself have found on the internet. Don't tell me these ladies came to your photography studio for this. I will no longer be following this thread and wasting my time. Have a nice day!
We'll see... I mean people could get the same thing for free just going to Safari... There are dozens of websites with umm 'racier' content than your app for free.. I'll be very interested to see the response to this app, as it may say something about web use vs. app use. Well regardless, good luck, and i'll be interested to see where this goes
I don't think BlazingLizard is quite comprehending the comments being made here. It's like there are these words but their import is curiously unfamiliar, as if they almost weren't ... nice. How weird is that? Who wouldn't be nice to an app that has pictures of beautiful women wrapped up in a contrived "game" in an attempt to give it some loftier purpose than being an excuse to show off pictures of babes? [Wallace Shawn] Inconceivable! [/Wallace Shawn]
I look at this app more as an experiment in male behavioral psychology. Much as in Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game", a hunter enjoys a long challenge in catching its prey, as long as there is indeed a chance of ultimately achieving the kill. If this were simply an app that showed pretty women, I think it would do less well than its current presentation of presenting some measure of challenge and incremental advances/retreats before the user ultimately achieves the desired goal. Time will tell...
Guys, give it a chance! When you shake it a few times to reveal more of the image, you'll see that it really is a peep show. Mmmm delicious peeps.
Never ascribe to psychology that which can be adequately explained by hormones. (With apologies to Oscar Wilde)
*sighs Why is this on the game forum? And why do otherwise very intelligent and sharp toucharcade.com forum members insist on not only calling this a game, but comparing it to actual games on this platform? Let's get this straight once again: THIS IS NOT A GAME. IT DOES NOT BELONG ON THIS SECTION OF THE FORUMS. IT BELONGS IN THE APP FORUM. Here: http://forums.toucharcade.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5 As for all you members that keep on calling this a game, and going on about iFart and whatnot as you have done in the past and using that in debates over the quality of the GAMES, once again: iFart, Peep Show, etc. are NOT games. They are entertainment apps. Separate section of the store, separate section of the market. Bringing up those entertainment apps in your railings against the quality of games on the platform is like bringing up something like, say, MS Paint on your PC as "proof" of crappy Windows PC games. It's silly. You notice that no one brings up the productivity or utility apps when discussing the state of games in the App Store. So why bring up entertainment apps? And, again, why is a topic about this entertainment app even on the Games forum? Remove this and put it where it squarely belongs: the App forum.
and just as quickly ANOTHER app hits the stores just for you pervs: iVanish http://appshopper.com/entertainment/ivanish
Pocket God is a "god game" (a subgenre of sim games) from what I can tell. Haven't played it yet though.
