/signed. Yeah we all bought into their hardware, and yes they do it well. But Apple as a whole, and a company just... just baffles me at times with decisions they make.
Insane reason for rejection, especially as they had already been in there. As for the being fast tracked, that is out of order IMO, plenty of other devs have been waiting on updates from before WWDC is be approved, just had one of mine approved today after 19 days waiting. The review system is bad enough without favoritism being shown to anyone.
Why are monuments offensive? Because they are afraid people shooting at them in a game? What basis does that have to be bad? But killing people is ok? HUH???
As I see it, the reason they don't give a solid description of what is allowed and what isn't is because any solid description is going to have loopholes. Try it yourself. Write a paragraph or two that would safely cover all potentially offensive material. The Supreme Court can't even define "obscenity" beyond "I know it when I see it", but we expect some guys working at Apple to do better? It's a thorny problem. What one person considers potentially offensive another might think is just fine. That's why we have issues like an 8-month old program getting kicked for images that were there all along. I don't see an easy solution, however.
nice this game fails so much it still has adverts in the pay version ill hope apple takes out the whole game due to FAIL
