Universal Ascension: Chronicle of the Godslayer [Dreamscape expansion]

Discussion in 'iPhone and iPad Games' started by Artfoundry, Jun 30, 2011.

  1. Camzy

    Camzy Well-Known Member

    May 31, 2009
    1,418
    0
    0
    Ah JCMan7...

    You need to be picking up the center row cards. There's a reason they're there! You not picking up Reactor Monk in the first 3 turns cost you that entire game. All the constructs popped up and I was always first to nab'em.

    Choices in this game (unless it's druids or the ineffective low cost heroes) are almost always between WHICH cards to pick in the center. Grand Design or Umbral Edge? Reactor Monk or Canopic Jar? But in almost all cases, the best card/play is in the center row.
     
  2. JCman7

    JCman7 Well-Known Member

    Jul 6, 2009
    2,548
    3
    36
    Mechanical Engineering
    NY
    lol ive played a long time but by far am not an expert like you. I try not to pickup cards in the center row to prevent the other player from getting constructs or defeating high power monsters if I had picked up a card and one would happen to appear. It works sometimes but then other times it backfires. Not to mention we were playing at 1am my time so im not the greatest thinker at that time lol
     
  3. ironcub14

    ironcub14 Well-Known Member

    Jan 25, 2013
    154
    0
    0
    Ontario
    Emos, Cprloe, can you guys play out your game live?
     
  4. sapphire_neo

    sapphire_neo Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2011
    3,934
    0
    0
    I just ran into an interesting combination of cards that did not play out as I had expected. I played Adayu to hit Tarik, who in turn copied Twofold Askara. Here my plan was to copy Adayu with the Askara, but the game did not allow me. The text on Twofold Askara says to copy the effect of any hero played this turn, and while the incomplete resolution of Tarik stemmed from Adayu, Adayu himself was already resolved in the stack and should have been available for copy. At least that's the way I see it. What do you guys think?
     
  5. Emos

    Emos Well-Known Member

    Dec 2, 2009
    478
    0
    16
    Cprloe won 2-1
     
  6. Ashraam

    Ashraam Well-Known Member

    Apr 25, 2010
    169
    0
    0
    France
    Does anybody have backed the Ascension's kickstarter ?

    I have to choose a card's art for my signed Sabee print... I really don't know which card's art i will choose...
     
  7. ironcub14

    ironcub14 Well-Known Member

    Jan 25, 2013
    154
    0
    0
    Ontario
    ROUND 4
    March 13, 2013, Page 348 of this thread

    Challonge bracket: Challonge.com/Ascension0213
    Length: 3 days, Best-of-3 games
    Round 4 deck: CotG + RotF + SoS
    Round 4 results by: March 17, 2013

    Post results in thread in this format in bold font: GC Player A defeats GC Player B, 2-1 - 100-80, 70-90, 60-40.

    Round 4

    7
    MLKeener
    9
    Emos

    8
    cprloe
    12
    currymutton

    3
    tjxtjx
    6
    pjft

    10
    almostrike
    5
    tecwrtr

    2
    ironcub14
    4
    JCman7

    1
    Artfoundry
    11
    Camzy
     
  8. JCman7

    JCman7 Well-Known Member

    Jul 6, 2009
    2,548
    3
    36
    Mechanical Engineering
    NY
    Good job ironcub! I knew I was doomed when I saw I got matched against you lol
     
  9. ironcub14

    ironcub14 Well-Known Member

    Jan 25, 2013
    154
    0
    0
    Ontario
    I backed the KS as well, and talked about it quite a bit on te AscensionGame forums and a little bit here and elsewhere. Im nowhere at the tier that you are though lol, I'm at the digital $10 tier, expecting it to pay for the expansions for PC and Android. Great project overall.
     
  10. ironcub14

    ironcub14 Well-Known Member

    Jan 25, 2013
    154
    0
    0
    Ontario
    Thanks guys, sorry if I sounded pushy!
     
  11. ironcub14

    ironcub14 Well-Known Member

    Jan 25, 2013
    154
    0
    0
    Ontario
    With just a quick skim, I would say that I would completely agree with you! My brain is a bit fried at the moment though haha. I think you should pose the question on their official Facebook or the rules section on their official forums. They'll usually reply on rules question like that. Im curious to know as well if it's following the rules or if it's a programming bug. Never ha the chance nor rea about using Trickster on Twofold yet!
     
  12. JCman7

    JCman7 Well-Known Member

    Jul 6, 2009
    2,548
    3
    36
    Mechanical Engineering
    NY
    Ironcub14 defeats JCman7 2-0 - 81-79, 63-52
     
  13. ironcub14

    ironcub14 Well-Known Member

    Jan 25, 2013
    154
    0
    0
    Ontario
    JCman, I am flattered but I dont think that was the case at all! Hahaha. Those were two intense games! My brain is too fried after the games to give any summaries, but I'll say that Game 2 was a poo-poo strategy on my part that I really hate in the game, the all Infantry, no Mystics strategy. Only did so because of all the factors: deck, opening hands, center row cards... I think that using all 3 decks seems to be the case where this strategy gets abused the most often, and so thats why Im not a fan of playing all 3 decks.

    Guys, for the playoffs, are we sticking with all 3 decks? If we can get near unanimous support, I'd be in favour of changing to SoS, or RotF + SoS. Please let us all know!!

    ironcub14 over JCman7, 2-0 - 81-79, 63-52

    JCman, incredible first game btw! Adayu vs Prime!
     
  14. JCman7

    JCman7 Well-Known Member

    Jul 6, 2009
    2,548
    3
    36
    Mechanical Engineering
    NY
    Yes the first game was very intense I must say I was pretty disappointed I lost, I've had too many close games go against me in this tourney lol. The second game there were so many monsters and I made a dumb move not to get infantry cards at the start, I'm with you I dislike those types of games. I also agree I'm not a big fan of playing all three decks I vote to change it next time! :)
     
  15. ironcub14

    ironcub14 Well-Known Member

    Jan 25, 2013
    154
    0
    0
    Ontario
    Hey I was absolutely lucky to pick up Adayu. The way te game went, that would have gone your way too and itd have been a rout.

    You had a great opening two rounds in Game 2, I thought. I knew I was already far behind but the center row stayed pure monsters after your two rounds, absolutely unlucky for you. I hope you are looking forward to the interforum tourney! And we have our friendly game now lol.
     
  16. ironcub14

    ironcub14 Well-Known Member

    Jan 25, 2013
    154
    0
    0
    Ontario
    Last post from me today guys, we are goin to a 3-5 man playoffs after Round 4, depending on how the final standings look like!

    And when Round 4 is done, I think we can start the interfoum tourney! I promise it'll be rly fun and the timelines will be more relaxed because we dont have anything after waiting. Take care all.
     
  17. JCman7

    JCman7 Well-Known Member

    Jul 6, 2009
    2,548
    3
    36
    Mechanical Engineering
    NY
    Absolutely I'm excited for the interforum tourney and for our friendly matches! I've had a blast so far thanks for making these tournaments happen!!
     
  18. Strangiato

    Strangiato Well-Known Member

    Feb 11, 2011
    140
    0
    0
    The rules allow it, and are technically programmed correctly. The bug is in the interface. Because Adayu is still in the process of resolving, it doesn't appear in the played card area, so there's no card for you to drag onto Twofold Askara to choose as the copy.

    I cleaned this up a bit when I implemented Askara of Fortune (which isn't allowed to choose Twofold Askara if it is revealed since that would create an infinite loop), so I'll double check that this gets corrected for the next update.
     
  19. sapphire_neo

    sapphire_neo Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2011
    3,934
    0
    0

    Excellent, looking forward to the new content!
     
  20. MLKeener

    MLKeener Active Member

    Jan 13, 2012
    40
    0
    0
    Emos,
    This invite counts, right?
     

Share This Page