Separate names with a comma.
I believe it's for making a 12288 card.
Over 1000 simulations, I got an average of one 4-card run every 185 cards. This doesn't account for bonus cards, however. Considering bonus...
I think it would need a lot more than many thousands runs to reach 12288 :-) I've let it run for 100,000 simulations to get some better figures...
Median moves to reach each card in a test run of 1000 simulation for the 1+2+2 configuration: 48: 25 moves 96: 51 moves 192: 97 moves 384:...
I'll need to log the time taken to reach each card, but your explanation looks spot on.
The thread has fallen asleep so let me try to awake it a bit. The other day I noticed something which made me question the way we have been...
I had the "oracle" bot doesn't get to choose which card to get or where to put it, it simply knows them in advance. Surely this is more...
I just needed a quick&dirty way to measure performance and this was the easiest way :-)
Easy enough. For 10 runs of the 1+2+3 configuration I logged this: 2391946846 evaluations in 66.744000 seconds, or 35837631 evaluations/sec...
Yes, my program is multithreaded too. I guess this is one of those cases where the raw power of C++ really shines, or there is some optimisation...
One interesting piece of information to add: I have done many tests using the same random seed, so that different versions of the bot played with...
Hi holyfuzz, good job with your bot. Good that you revived the thread, because I also had some new results from the latest version of my bot. I...
People, don't dismiss that link as just a throwaway curiosity. That app is mind blowing. If you have even a passing interest in the Mandelbrot...
The "oracle" bot has perfect knowledge of exactly which cards will come next, and on which lines they will be inserted. It therefore can work with...
I think the key is the scoring function, since the depth of my lookahead is half of yours. Also, before computing the score of the final position...
Hi nneonneo, great work with your bot! How many attempts did it take to reach that high score? My bot has no automation, I literally have to copy...
Interesting question. I made it do a couple of games logging the extreme balances (+-4), and the bot was able to cope with them quite happily when...
To throw in some more information: the "oracle" version of my bot with 8-step lookahead reaches 12288 in 18% of the games. I think I only made it...
With purely random moves, over 100,000 attempts: Never went above 192, and reached 192 only 15 times. The median score was just 228, with max...
And here are the results over 100 simulations. 384: 100% 768: 99% (was 98%) 1536: 80% (was 67%) 3072: 20% (was 10%) 6144: 2% (was...
