<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 3G S vs. iPod Touch CPU, OpenGL ES Benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/</link>
	<description>... keeping in touch with the latest in iPhone gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:21:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RobCRX</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/#comment-31280</link>
		<dc:creator>RobCRX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=10910#comment-31280</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m beginning to feel the cold shoulder of app developers. iPod touch users will have far lower specs and all the new games that take advantage of open gl 2.0 will be hardly playable on the ipot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m beginning to feel the cold shoulder of app developers. iPod touch users will have far lower specs and all the new games that take advantage of open gl 2.0 will be hardly playable on the ipot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roofers in west yorkshire</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/#comment-28548</link>
		<dc:creator>roofers in west yorkshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=10910#comment-28548</guid>
		<description>i wish they just went the whole hog and changed it completely, make it twice as fast insted of the steady upgrades</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wish they just went the whole hog and changed it completely, make it twice as fast insted of the steady upgrades</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RPGbig</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/#comment-28253</link>
		<dc:creator>RPGbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=10910#comment-28253</guid>
		<description>Emulators aren&#039;t illeagal if you own the game(s) and system. I sought many people use them leagal tho. Psx probley still won&#039;t run at full speed but some where close. Fast wifi and more ram would be cool too. 

There are going to be fixs to make it not jailbreak able for probley 6+ months because some retard wanted to make a quick buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emulators aren&#039;t illeagal if you own the game(s) and system. I sought many people use them leagal tho. Psx probley still won&#039;t run at full speed but some where close. Fast wifi and more ram would be cool too. </p>
<p>There are going to be fixs to make it not jailbreak able for probley 6+ months because some retard wanted to make a quick buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bammaster</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/#comment-26750</link>
		<dc:creator>Bammaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=10910#comment-26750</guid>
		<description>Lol cause emulatings not illegal right? Anyways i know the 3gs is great and all but i have verizon so the iPod touch 4g(since its been announced to skip a gen) is what im hyped about. Ive been stuck with a first gen touch and its not been fun missing out on all the new 3.0 features. Anyone have anyother news about it other than the new wifi adapter and RAM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol cause emulatings not illegal right? Anyways i know the 3gs is great and all but i have verizon so the iPod touch 4g(since its been announced to skip a gen) is what im hyped about. Ive been stuck with a first gen touch and its not been fun missing out on all the new 3.0 features. Anyone have anyother news about it other than the new wifi adapter and RAM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/#comment-26732</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=10910#comment-26732</guid>
		<description>this means the PS1 emulator will actualy run fast :) finaly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this means the PS1 emulator will actualy run fast <img src='http://toucharcade.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  finaly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drunknbass</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/#comment-26507</link>
		<dc:creator>Drunknbass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=10910#comment-26507</guid>
		<description>I can wait till we get some optimized math libraries that take advantage of the neon and really see how much more this phone can handle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can wait till we get some optimized math libraries that take advantage of the neon and really see how much more this phone can handle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedie</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/#comment-26502</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=10910#comment-26502</guid>
		<description>So, this post is about how a newer device with a faster processor is...faster?

Seemed like a lot of text just to tell me that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, this post is about how a newer device with a faster processor is&#8230;faster?</p>
<p>Seemed like a lot of text just to tell me that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedie</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/#comment-26501</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=10910#comment-26501</guid>
		<description>LOL You do *not* pay more for the iPod Touch. Where you came up with the reasoning of &quot;we pay more even though you pay for the service monthly!&quot; is beyond me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL You do *not* pay more for the iPod Touch. Where you came up with the reasoning of &#034;we pay more even though you pay for the service monthly!&#034; is beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avalonhighgirl</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/#comment-26498</link>
		<dc:creator>avalonhighgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=10910#comment-26498</guid>
		<description>technically we pay more for the iTouch than you pay for the iPhone you just have to pay a monthly bill that you got sucked into because you didn&#039;t want to carry around a phone and an iTouch so suck it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>technically we pay more for the iTouch than you pay for the iPhone you just have to pay a monthly bill that you got sucked into because you didn&#039;t want to carry around a phone and an iTouch so suck it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spiffyone</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/06/20/iphone-3g-s-vs-ipod-touch-cpu-opengl-es-benchmarks/#comment-26479</link>
		<dc:creator>spiffyone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=10910#comment-26479</guid>
		<description>I know that.  But in the game industry &quot;generation&quot; refers not to minor redesigns but &quot;next gen successors&quot; to previously released consoles.  In effect, the PS2 Slim redesign of the PS2 is not a new &quot;gen&quot;, but a redesign.  The PS3 is the new &quot;gen&quot; console successor to PS2.

So it&#039;s not a matter of &quot;wrong and irrelevant&quot; but rather &quot;wrong only if one is NOT using the term as used by gamers and within the video game hardware industry&quot;.  Apple is not using the term in the manner that gamers have, but rather the way that they always have within the mobile media player market.

And I was kidding, btw...so don&#039;t get your panties in a bunch  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that.  But in the game industry &#034;generation&#034; refers not to minor redesigns but &#034;next gen successors&#034; to previously released consoles.  In effect, the PS2 Slim redesign of the PS2 is not a new &#034;gen&#034;, but a redesign.  The PS3 is the new &#034;gen&#034; console successor to PS2.</p>
<p>So it&#039;s not a matter of &#034;wrong and irrelevant&#034; but rather &#034;wrong only if one is NOT using the term as used by gamers and within the video game hardware industry&#034;.  Apple is not using the term in the manner that gamers have, but rather the way that they always have within the mobile media player market.</p>
<p>And I was kidding, btw&#8230;so don&#039;t get your panties in a bunch  <img src='http://toucharcade.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
